When looking to accomplish any goal, always look to identify
who and where are one’s allies. That is
to say, always look to see who else supports the attainment of your goal and
look to team with them towards the common goal.
Of course, some consortium of leadership might be required to accomplish
any common goals when partnering with others.
For example in the U.S.A., has anyone else noticed that both
the Occupy Movement and the Tea Party Movement have/had essentially the same
goals but are/were possibly approaching the common goal in the middle of their
outlooks from the two opposite ends of the political spectrum, so to speak –
this, irrespective of wherever it is to which the Occupy Movement disappeared
as well as irrespective of any superficial notions regarding the mindsets maintained
by the constituents of those two groups/movements in that these mindsets appear
(or have been portrayed) as totally/essentially
diverging from one another? Were their
mindsets and goals portrayed as not compatible so that they would not team
together? Would they have teamed either
way, with or without any divergent portrayals of their mindsets by the ‘mainstream’
media outlets (or whoever)? Anyway, that’s
where the common/consortium of leadership aspect has to step-in. These groups (Occupy and Tea Party Movements) had no common leadership and likewise
neither group appears to have been especially successful in accomplishing perceived goals
to date – common or otherwise. Maybe
their goals needed better definition too, but…
Then again, the final chapter may
have yet to be written on the matters, of course.
AVT
(July, 2014)
