Seigniorage: An Inflation Tax to Benefit the Overlord.
(See: Seigniorage: An Inflation Tax to Benefit the Overlord – a Survey; at: http://engineeringandcommerce.blogspot.com/2013/08/seigniorage-inflation-tax-to-overlord.html
AVT (August, 2013)
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Fascists on Power-Trips: The NSA and IRS. …Flush ‘Em!
June 9th, 2013
As recently reported news stories have apparently shown, the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the National Security Agency (NSA) have
routinely practiced an unwarranted targeting of millions of Americans for
harassment (IRS) and spying (NSA). All
these policies and unconstitutional indiscretions levied upon us by these
Federal agencies were done so courtesy of our tax-dollars, it should be
remembered.
As We now know, the IRS has reportedly singled-out millions
of Americans and political groups for harassment because the targeted
individuals and groups did not politically agree with the ideals of the current
politicians in power in Washington, DC – or so it seems, all with the apparent
blessings of those in power and for however long all this has been happening. I am personally aware of medical doctors and
their staff who were audited by the IRS apparently because these individuals spoke their
opinions against the ‘Obama-care’ national healthcare plan, as but one example.
The NSA, for its part, has reportedly targeted millions of
regular Americans for spying. Per those
reports, in addition to spying on news reporters, this spying by the NSA
included forcing internet companies such as Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook,
Skype, and AOL (to name a few) to make available all internet records / transactions
/ conversations undertaken by essentially any and all Americans – or so it is
being reported. The NSA has been blanket-spying
on blogs, phone records, emails, instant messages, and any electronic
correspondence to see if any Americans might be speaking on subjects or in a manner to which the NSA or other apparent-fascists
in Washington would not approve. (Have
We seen happenings like this before in our Nation’s history?)
Founding Father Benjamin Franklin himself is credited as
saying: “when one sacrifices liberty for safety, they end up with neither” or
“deserve neither;” or something to that extent.
I would offer that agencies like the NSA and the IRS operate in no other
manner than to sacrifice liberties and have not even offered any safety in
return for the transgressions of these agencies. More to the point, it’s like what a clergyman
told me years ago, “…if you can’t tell others what you are doing, you probably
shouldn’t be doing it.” (See: If you can’t tell others what you are doing,
you probably should not be doing it. http://poetrybyadamvernontrotter.blogspot.com/2011/03/if-you-cant-tell-others-what-you-are.html) Ironic all the more in that the current
President seemed to come into Office with that clergyman’s tone of decency
towards individual rights of privacy and also in opposition to clandestine
government operations – or so the President once mentioned anyhow. I guess the President has since changed his
opinion on any such fairness and clandestine government actions, apparently.
Hey NSA…, have you been spying on my blog and my phone
records too? Were you able to understand
my blog or did it speak too much of freedom for you to relate to it?
Hey IRS…, are you ‘gonna audit my tax returns and take my
assets too? To be frank, I don’t care. You know why?
Because I try to be honest and abide by our laws, even if the laws do
not maybe always appear as just – such as with your tax code. Can you relate?
To the NSA folks in Fort Meade
and elsewhere, maybe you can get a hall-pass to go to a computer that allows
you to email to the outside world and send me a response to this blog? Let’s face it, if agencies such as the NSA
cant even trust their own employees – and the NSA tends to hire more spies as
employees than most any other employer anyhow, what good are they to the
American public – especially now that the agency has reportedly turned its
‘evil eye’ on the American public at large?
And as far as we can tell this apparently fascist-leaning NSA agency
hasn’t even made it any safer for the American public anyhow. Do We need to
remember the latest Boston Massacre where our intelligence community reportedly ignored advanced
warnings about the loser bomber creeps - where this advance information was provided by the Russians? Or, what about the Ft. Hood
creep whereby the loser-homicidal creep was one of their/our own DoD employees
(who is still receiving his Army pay check, btw; see link below)? Or, what about the would-be Times Square bomber in 2010, where only the diligence and
inquisitive nature of a local NYC beat-cop and street vendor prevented the
massacre? With a record like that…, like…,
how much taxpayer money do we give the NSA anyhow? Oh yea, We probably are not allowed to know
that dollar figure as that is classified information – even though its our tax
dollars. While We’re at it, We should vote out of office all
the politicians in the intelligence committees too – they also seem as much
inept dorks as those at the NSA!
As for the IRS, I suggest We get rid of this likely
unconstitutional agency all together.
Simply go to a flat tax if income taxes must be collected. Merely let the computers verify all the
submitted information and save the money wasted on these IRS dorks and their
lavish million dollar parties in Las Vegas too (or Anaheim, or wherever, See: IRS
officials tied to conference spending put on leave, http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2013/06/05/IRS-officials-tied-to-conference-spending-put-on-leave/UPI-60881370415600/)
! Income tax is likely to be
unconstitutional anyhow. If it were not,
the Founding Fathers would have implemented it themselves.
Do I sound irked with this blog? That’s because I am! Anytime the People’s tax-dollars are utilized
to the detriment of the People and the Nation, I am perturbed! Quashing the People's Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression is a detriment to the Nation. My opinions and my words are how I respond in
kind. Should this response Rightly be
classified as nearly illegal or ‘suspicious’ to the folks at the NSA or the
IRS? Should I then be singled-out for
special harassment by the logic of these fascist-leaning Federal agencies for
exercising my First Amendment Rights?
Good thing for me that these agencies don’t actually make the laws,
huh? Unfortunately for all of Us,
however, these agencies apparently do seem to enforce the laws as these
agencies desire, nevertheless.
In the end, I say We dump ‘em and flush these fascist-leaning
agencies known as the IRS and the NSA.
What do you say, reader of this blog entry? The Federal government seems
to have become so bloated and contrary to the principles of the Nation that it
no longer seems to serve the Populace as is the mandate of all of our tax-funded
governments across the land, per the Federal Constitution – at least in my
opinion. It appears it’s time to save
our tax money and start to trim down the governments. I say we start by dumpin’ both the IRS and
the NSA. The recent fascist behavior of
these agencies shows I am likely justified in my opinion!
Adam Vernon Trotter
PS. It could have been the IRS harassing the news reporters and not the NSA. I've lost track of the many exact details at this point. Ultimately, it is all the same in my book.
PS. It could have been the IRS harassing the news reporters and not the NSA. I've lost track of the many exact details at this point. Ultimately, it is all the same in my book.
often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or
regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the
individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a
dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible
suppression of opposition
fas·cism (from: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fascism?s=t&path=/)
noun
1.
( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system
led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and
criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an
aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2.
( sometimes initial capital letter ) the philosophy,
principles, or methods of fascism.
3.
( initial capital letter ) a political movement that employs
the principles and methods of fascism, especially the one established by Mussolini
in Italy
1922–43.
Origin:
1915–20; < Italian fascismo, equivalent to fasc(io)
bundle, political group (see fasces) + -ismo –ism
Note: Today, the
term fascist is used loosely to refer to military dictatorships, as well as
governments or individuals that profess racism and that act in an arbitrary,
high-handed manner.
Conservative leaders detail IRS harassment
(me/AVT: funny how
much of the news media tries its best to make it a partisan issue based on
party lines, as that is all most of the media seems to see)
NSA claims know-how to ensure no illegal spying
(me/AVT: Despite
admitting nearly everything I wrote above, it’s funny how even Boston 'liberals' seem to be defending the NSA
fascists. Would they feel the same had
it not been a ‘liberal’ Democratic Administration in power of which they surely
support? I doubt it!)
Julian Assange: NSA, FBI programs amount to "mass
spying" on Americans
Russian official: US ‘ignored Boston bombers warning’
Bomb suspects planned second attack: Times
Square
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/04/25/boston-bombing-times-square-dahokhar-tsarnaev-attack/2112991/
Accused Fort
Hood Shooter Paid
$278,000 While Awaiting Trial
2010 Times Square car
bombing attempt
Ben Franklin Quotes
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/b/benjaminfr136955.html
(me/AVT: since writing the above blog entry, the NSA whistleblower reportedly has come forward or has had his identity revealed while the whistleblower is reportedly in hiding oversees ,See:
much of the content of my blog entry above rests on the assumption of truth of these allegations as the allegations have been reported. As the President did not seem to disagree with these reported allegations, We appear justified to assume the allegations are based on Truth. AVT )
After thought, April 3rd, 2014:
I might have to reconsider my thoughts on Snowden and the NSA in general, maybe. But again, never really know... But this link below is an interesting point of view and could be correct and offers new insights too.
(me/AVT: since writing the above blog entry, the NSA whistleblower reportedly has come forward or has had his identity revealed while the whistleblower is reportedly in hiding oversees ,See:
The Guardian Reveals Identity of NSA Whistleblower [Updated]
much of the content of my blog entry above rests on the assumption of truth of these allegations as the allegations have been reported. As the President did not seem to disagree with these reported allegations, We appear justified to assume the allegations are based on Truth. AVT )
After thought, April 3rd, 2014:
I might have to reconsider my thoughts on Snowden and the NSA in general, maybe. But again, never really know... But this link below is an interesting point of view and could be correct and offers new insights too.
Russia evades US SIGINT surveillance – Has Snowden turned
spy?
http://siliconangle.com/blog/2014/03/31/russia-evades-us-sigint-surveillance-has-snowden-turned-spy/
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Armed Robber Killed by Armed Resident, Texas City.
June 3rd, 2013
As I have blogged several times before, when the would-be
victim is armed with a defensive firearm, the violent creeps often end up with
more than they bargained for.
The factual basis for this blog was originally reported as a
home invasion robbery by Houston
television news. But the story
eventually changed to one where the homeowner had returned home and got out of
his car to be confronted in his driveway by two masked robbers who were also
armed – or so it is reported.
But this story has a different ending than most:
Unlike jurisdictions where the populace has been emasculated
to the point where laws prevent the innocent from adequately defending
themselves with firearms regardless of the situation, in places such as Texas , homeowners typically
are not prevented by statutory law from defending themselves with lethal force on
their own property.
It is stories such as this one that lend themselves to my
logic which states that all decent folk should be armed with defensive firearms
to weed-out the violent creeps who remain free among us. If you don’t agree with me, do a Google
search of home invasions and robberies in your area and see how many of the
defenseless home owners and victims end up murdered by these lawless
creeps.
What do you say, Mayor Bloomberg? Is this merely another death caused by
handguns on the list maintained by your anti-gun group? In your jurisdiction, this homeowner would
likely be charged with murder as he is still alive to defend against any such
charges, correct? It seems in
jurisdictions like yours, the defense of the criminal’s rights is the primary
concern of the law. Fortunately, some
jurisdictions – such as most of them in Texas
– do not agree with the perspective of NYC laws. In places like Texas , the violent creeps deserve whatever
misfortune befalls them as a result of the creep’s lawless behavior.
In reality, we can only wonder how many other lives may have
saved by this properly placed handgun which was in the hands of the Texas City homeowner. How many others in the house were saved by
this handgun? How many others may have
been spared the grief of coming home to find this creep waiting in the driveway
to rob them, had this creep not been removed from society at-large by this Texas City homeowner?
AVT
This is how we do it in Texas
Saturday, June 1, 2013
U.S. Government Buys All Small Arms Ammunition Casings in Marketplace
May 31st, 2013
The Federal government and/or the current presidential
administration has apparently decided that since it can’t rally the support to
outlaw guns across the nation, it will unilaterally buy all the ammunition
casings so that no firearms ammunition can be made for civilians to purchase. For instance, along with many other types of
ammunition, there essentially appears to be no .22 Long caliber rounds for sale
anywhere in the Southwestern portion of the nation. The merchants selling these products all
state that the shortage of ammunition for sale is because the Federal
government has bought the nation’s entire supply of shell casings for whatever
stated reason.
It seems that the government has determined there is more
than one way to skin a cat when it comes to revoking any Constitutional Rights
to bear arms – an enumerated power left to the American populace by the
Nation’s Founding Fathers and a Right of which the current administration and
its allies obviously don’t approve. Of
course, as a self-professed Constitutionalist, I have previously blogged on
this matter several times.
AVT
See:
Homeland Security under investigation for massive ammo buys
See also:
Jim Inhofe: Federal Government Has 'Taken' All The
Ammunition
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Unsteady Alternator / Voltmeter Instrument Gauge Readings.
See:
Unsteady Alternator / Voltmeter Instrument Gauge Readings .
AVT
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Hofstra Killing: More ‘Liberal Agenda’ Absurdities!
May 19th, 2013
To begin with, I wish to pass along my condolences to the
victim and to her friends and family as well as to the Hofstra University
See: Hofstra Student Fatally Shot in Home Invasion Near
Campus, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/nyregion/hofstra-student-killed-during-home-invasion.html?_r=0. And, Long Island police defend Hofstra
student killing, http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57585197/long-island-police-defend-hofstra-student-killing/
Cops fired bullet that killed Hofstra
student Andrea Rebello during botched robbery: authorities, http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/hofstra-gunman-identified-thug-wanted-parole-violation-article-1.1347916.
//
With regrets…,
The recent killing of a Hofstra University student as the
result of a violent creep breaking-into the female student's off-campus apartment again displays the
absurdities of what we can call the ‘liberal agenda’ of the current leadership
in states such as New York. Essentially,
the circumstance of the death of the innocent victim as it is currently
understood at the time of this writing includes the fact that a violent creep
broke-into the female student’s off-campus apartment near the university. When the police came to the scene to rescue
her, they killed the violent creep but also apparently shot and killed the
innocent victim as well. The violent creep reportedly had been only recently released from prison and was currently on parole.
This matter again shows the many fatal flaws of the much
subscribed ‘liberal agenda’ across our nation.
By ‘liberal agenda’ and its flaws, I mean that the current ‘liberal’
leadership of states such as New York seem willing to let nearly any violent
creep out of prison while concurrently this same ‘liberal’ leadership refuses
to allow the decent and law-abiding folks to have and bear firearms to defend
themselves from violent attack – attack often brought about by those who should
otherwise have been institutionalized if not for the policies of any given
dysfunctional leadership in power.
When trouble breaks-out, as it so often seems to do time and
time again throughout our states, these same ‘liberal’ leaders expect the
populace to merely wait at the mercy of the local police departments – police
who generally have no legal duty to protect us at all, it must be noted. When the police eventually respond, be it
quickly or otherwise, there is no guaranty that the innocent will be any safer
in the end, as it often turns out. Regardless
of any Constitutional issues, the ‘liberal’ leaders then still prefer to
disallow the citizenry any right to defend ourselves by carrying firearms and
often deny that the citizenry should be allowed to defend our homes and
families with firearms in many cases as well, or so it seems. And, the ‘liberal’ laws enacted to these ends
seem to reflect such an ignorance and appear typically buried in the same
psychological denial of the aforementioned lawmakers as well.
//
Well…, what do you say, Mayor Bloomberg? Should this innocent victim not have been
allowed to have a firearm to defend herself (which she did not have, apparently)? Was she safer without having
the ability to defend herself with a firearm?
We can be fairly sure the violent creep probably knew that a female college student on Long Island would not have a defensive handgun in her apartment,
given the typically unconstitutional laws against the right to bear arms in many
places under the control of the ‘liberal agenda’ such as in places like Long
Island and the greater New York City area.
Of course, we know that in New
York , even if she did have a gun and shot the creep
at first site inside her apartment, the leaders of the ‘liberal agenda’ would
have likely charged her with murder in that jurisdiction – given the
absurdities and unconstitutional nature of the laws there. Mayor Bloomberg…, with all due respect, was she better to wait for
the police to rescue her similar to the unfortunate souls of the Empire State
Building's
Well…, what do you say, President Obama? Would this innocent victim posthumously vote
to not be allowed to have access to a firearm to defend herself? I did not know her personally of course, but: I doubt it! However, according to your apparent outlook as I understand it, she was safer without any firearms to defend herself. Correct? (See: The
Innocent Victims Deserve a Vote! I agree. But..., http://adamvernontrotter.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-innocent-victims-deserve-vote-i.html)
//
I say it’s time to vote out of office any such individuals who run our
governments and yet maintain such unrealistic viewpoints as what I describe in this blog entry as
the ‘liberal agenda’!
These same politicians who ride around with multitudes of armed guards,
police escorts, and drivers in bullet-proof limousines then have the
audacity to turn-around and tell the average citizens of the nation that we
need no devices such as firearms with which to defend ourselves from the
attacks of violent creeps. Albeit often attack from the same violent creeps that the ‘liberal’ leaders released from the nation’s
prisons, as it turns out! Again, all
these absurdities and unconstitutionalities brought about courtesy of our tax
dollars, no less!
IN place of the ousted unrealistic politicians, I say we
elect politicians who would pass laws that would allow for individuals to
continue their Rightful ability to defend oneself from violent attack at
anytime and by any means and that WE also elect politicians who would vote for more laws as necessary to ensure that the citizens be
allowed the continued lawful ability to defend themselves from any reasonably
perceived threat of bodily harm at nearly any given place and with any given means as well – regardless
if the perceived threat is to one’s self, one’s family and friends, innocent
bystanders, or maybe even from threat to any property as well.
The bottom line appears as: If our dysfunctional governments
can not remove these violent creeps from our midst, maybe the alternative is
that the time is likely at hand for the decent folks of the nation to do so
ourselves. We can be sure that weaponry
will likely be needed to accomplish our goals, unfortunately.
Adam Trotter
PS. To the victim Ms.
Rebello, her family, and the Hofstra community, I wish to extend apologies in
addition to my condolences if the words of this blog entry appear as
inappropriate or insensitive to your plight.
Again, Ms. Rebello appears as yet another martyr to the absurdities of
our time. May she rest in peace.
See:
Aurora Movie Theater Massacre: ALLOW ALL DECENT FOLK TO HAVE
AND CARRY GUNS FOR DEFENSE!!! http://adamvernontrotter.blogspot.com/2012/07/aurora-movie-theater-massacre-shows-us.html
Fuck the Stupid Drug War; Let’s Start a War on Violent
Creeps!!!
Stop the Violence on Our Streets and in Our Society!!! If It
Takes Violence to Do So, Well.... Damn the Torpedoes, Full Steam Ahead!!
Mass Murder in Norway – A Nation Where Few
Civilians Are Allowed to Carry Guns for Self-Defense. What Say You, Mayor
Bloomberg?
As for the differences that can be made by the presence or
absence of a defensive firearm when faced with attack in the NYC area, for
example see the following:
Handguns Save Life and Property, While the Defenseless Can
Lose Everything,
NYC Mayor Bloomberg Calls for Tougher Gun-Control While
Elderly Staten Island Couple Is Nearly Beaten
To Death In Apartment Building Lobby,
Armed Jewelry Store Robbers Sent Fleeing By Armed Store
Owner In the Bronx . My On-Going ‘Unofficial’
Gun-Control ‘Debate’ with NYC Mayor Bloomberg,
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Asking Again, Would They Tell Us…, If…?
May 9th, 2013
Especially given recent trespasses and seemingly on-going daily
transgressions, would they tell Us – even if they actually knew?
Personally, I don’t have any idea as to the answer. That’s why I’m asking.
AVT
See:
Is the Nation Under Siege? Could We Trust the Nation’s Press
to Tell Us?
The Press: Abuse is inseparable from the proper use of every
thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)