May 19th, 2013
To begin with, I wish to pass along my condolences to the
victim and to her friends and family as well as to the Hofstra University
See: Hofstra Student Fatally Shot in Home Invasion Near
Campus, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/18/nyregion/hofstra-student-killed-during-home-invasion.html?_r=0. And, Long Island police defend Hofstra
student killing, http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57585197/long-island-police-defend-hofstra-student-killing/
Cops fired bullet that killed Hofstra
student Andrea Rebello during botched robbery: authorities, http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/hofstra-gunman-identified-thug-wanted-parole-violation-article-1.1347916.
//
With regrets…,
The recent killing of a Hofstra University student as the
result of a violent creep breaking-into the female student's off-campus apartment again displays the
absurdities of what we can call the ‘liberal agenda’ of the current leadership
in states such as New York. Essentially,
the circumstance of the death of the innocent victim as it is currently
understood at the time of this writing includes the fact that a violent creep
broke-into the female student’s off-campus apartment near the university. When the police came to the scene to rescue
her, they killed the violent creep but also apparently shot and killed the
innocent victim as well. The violent creep reportedly had been only recently released from prison and was currently on parole.
This matter again shows the many fatal flaws of the much
subscribed ‘liberal agenda’ across our nation.
By ‘liberal agenda’ and its flaws, I mean that the current ‘liberal’
leadership of states such as New York seem willing to let nearly any violent
creep out of prison while concurrently this same ‘liberal’ leadership refuses
to allow the decent and law-abiding folks to have and bear firearms to defend
themselves from violent attack – attack often brought about by those who should
otherwise have been institutionalized if not for the policies of any given
dysfunctional leadership in power.
When trouble breaks-out, as it so often seems to do time and
time again throughout our states, these same ‘liberal’ leaders expect the
populace to merely wait at the mercy of the local police departments – police
who generally have no legal duty to protect us at all, it must be noted. When the police eventually respond, be it
quickly or otherwise, there is no guaranty that the innocent will be any safer
in the end, as it often turns out. Regardless
of any Constitutional issues, the ‘liberal’ leaders then still prefer to
disallow the citizenry any right to defend ourselves by carrying firearms and
often deny that the citizenry should be allowed to defend our homes and
families with firearms in many cases as well, or so it seems. And, the ‘liberal’ laws enacted to these ends
seem to reflect such an ignorance and appear typically buried in the same
psychological denial of the aforementioned lawmakers as well.
//
Well…, what do you say, Mayor Bloomberg? Should this innocent victim not have been
allowed to have a firearm to defend herself (which she did not have, apparently)? Was she safer without having
the ability to defend herself with a firearm?
We can be fairly sure the violent creep probably knew that a female college student on Long Island would not have a defensive handgun in her apartment,
given the typically unconstitutional laws against the right to bear arms in many
places under the control of the ‘liberal agenda’ such as in places like Long
Island and the greater New York City area.
Of course, we know that in New
York , even if she did have a gun and shot the creep
at first site inside her apartment, the leaders of the ‘liberal agenda’ would
have likely charged her with murder in that jurisdiction – given the
absurdities and unconstitutional nature of the laws there. Mayor Bloomberg…, with all due respect, was she better to wait for
the police to rescue her similar to the unfortunate souls of the Empire State
Building's
Well…, what do you say, President Obama? Would this innocent victim posthumously vote
to not be allowed to have access to a firearm to defend herself? I did not know her personally of course, but: I doubt it! However, according to your apparent outlook as I understand it, she was safer without any firearms to defend herself. Correct? (See: The
Innocent Victims Deserve a Vote! I agree. But..., http://adamvernontrotter.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-innocent-victims-deserve-vote-i.html)
//
I say it’s time to vote out of office any such individuals who run our
governments and yet maintain such unrealistic viewpoints as what I describe in this blog entry as
the ‘liberal agenda’!
These same politicians who ride around with multitudes of armed guards,
police escorts, and drivers in bullet-proof limousines then have the
audacity to turn-around and tell the average citizens of the nation that we
need no devices such as firearms with which to defend ourselves from the
attacks of violent creeps. Albeit often attack from the same violent creeps that the ‘liberal’ leaders released from the nation’s
prisons, as it turns out! Again, all
these absurdities and unconstitutionalities brought about courtesy of our tax
dollars, no less!
IN place of the ousted unrealistic politicians, I say we
elect politicians who would pass laws that would allow for individuals to
continue their Rightful ability to defend oneself from violent attack at
anytime and by any means and that WE also elect politicians who would vote for more laws as necessary to ensure that the citizens be
allowed the continued lawful ability to defend themselves from any reasonably
perceived threat of bodily harm at nearly any given place and with any given means as well – regardless
if the perceived threat is to one’s self, one’s family and friends, innocent
bystanders, or maybe even from threat to any property as well.
The bottom line appears as: If our dysfunctional governments
can not remove these violent creeps from our midst, maybe the alternative is
that the time is likely at hand for the decent folks of the nation to do so
ourselves. We can be sure that weaponry
will likely be needed to accomplish our goals, unfortunately.
Adam Trotter
PS. To the victim Ms.
Rebello, her family, and the Hofstra community, I wish to extend apologies in
addition to my condolences if the words of this blog entry appear as
inappropriate or insensitive to your plight.
Again, Ms. Rebello appears as yet another martyr to the absurdities of
our time. May she rest in peace.
See:
Aurora Movie Theater Massacre: ALLOW ALL DECENT FOLK TO HAVE
AND CARRY GUNS FOR DEFENSE!!! http://adamvernontrotter.blogspot.com/2012/07/aurora-movie-theater-massacre-shows-us.html
Fuck the Stupid Drug War; Let’s Start a War on Violent
Creeps!!!
Stop the Violence on Our Streets and in Our Society!!! If It
Takes Violence to Do So, Well.... Damn the Torpedoes, Full Steam Ahead!!
Mass Murder in Norway – A Nation Where Few
Civilians Are Allowed to Carry Guns for Self-Defense. What Say You, Mayor
Bloomberg?
As for the differences that can be made by the presence or
absence of a defensive firearm when faced with attack in the NYC area, for
example see the following:
Handguns Save Life and Property, While the Defenseless Can
Lose Everything,
NYC Mayor Bloomberg Calls for Tougher Gun-Control While
Elderly Staten Island Couple Is Nearly Beaten
To Death In Apartment Building Lobby,
Armed Jewelry Store Robbers Sent Fleeing By Armed Store
Owner In the Bronx . My On-Going ‘Unofficial’
Gun-Control ‘Debate’ with NYC Mayor Bloomberg,
